EXECUTION OF JUDGEMENT AS A FINAL STAGE OF ADMINISTRATIVE CASE PROCESSING

Author
, PhD. Student, Kharkiv, Pushinska, 77

In heading

 Law;

Signed print

 21.10.2016

Issues number

 2016 - № 3 (26)

Page

 248-260

Type of articles

 Scientific article

Code UDK

 342.565.4

ISSN print

 2411-5584

Abstract

 Problem setting. The necessity of providing effectiveness of achieving the main goal of administrative proceedings – providing judicial protection of rights, liberties, and legal interests of individuals and legal entities – stipulates the topicality of researches of normative, institutional, and procedure aspects of execution of administrative court judgements. Such researches focus on theoretical scientific papers in the field of administrative law (particularly, a place of execution of administrative court decisions) as well as theoretical and applied examination (for instance, normative and legal regulation of
a procedure of execution of administrative court decisions). The presented article is one of the mentioned papers.
Recent research and publication analysis. A matter of execution of judgement as an institution of law, law enforcement, and a procedure have been over and over again considered by domestic scientists. In terms of civil and economic processes, V. V. Barankova, O. V. Hetmantsev, V. V. Komarov, M. Ye. Shtefan, etc. have dedicated their papers to this problem. Researchers such as V. V. Zui, Ye. F. Demskyi, I. B. Koliushko, V. K. Kolpakova, O. V. Konstantyi, R. O. Kuibida, N. B. Pysarenko, V. B. Rusanova, etc. have taken notice of problems of execution of administrative court decisions. At the same time, the mentioned scientists consider the institution of execution of administrative court decisions superficially and in the context of other problems or as a component of more general matters.
Paper objective. The article is aimed at analysis of doctrinal approaches to understanding the sense of execution of administrative case judgements with the regard for statements of the legislation and court practice, formulation of own perception of the latter, determination of legal nature execution of administrative case judgements as a procedure and a set of norms regulating this procedure.
Paper main body. The article presents the main scientific approaches to determination of the role of a procedure of execution of judgements during corresponding (civil, administrative, economic, etc.) legal processing. The author agrees that execution of judgements is a precisely final stage of administrative proceedings. The article indicates that this approach conforms to logics of the Code of Administrative Procedures of Ukraine, the practice of the Supreme Administrative Court of Ukraine, and case law of the European Court of Human Rights. The author pays attention to the correlation of concepts «execution of judgement» and «enforcement proceeding». The author emphasizes that execution of judgement is always related to specificity of a court administrative process, its purpose and
goals, and previous stages of court processing.
Taking into account theoretical and legal understanding the institution of law as a component of the system of law (uniformity of a regulated subject, autonomy, formal distinctness in legislative acts, and specificity of regulation principles, concepts, and juridical constructions), the author proves that norms regulating execution of administrative case judgements are characterized as the institution of administrative process law.
Conclusion of the research. The approaches to understanding nature of execution of administrative case judgements considered in this article are aimed at formation of the theoretical basis for research of this institution of law. Defining execution of judgements as a final stage of a court process enables to examine this procedure in the context of other stages of a court administrative process, taking into consideration specificity of the latter at the execution stage, and development of an entire notion on authorities and processual actions of the administrative court at this stage. All these aspect may be subjects to further research.
Short Abstract for an article
Аbstract. The article researches the sense and nature of execution of administrative case judgements. The latter is considered as a final stage of an administrative court process. Having analyzed features being inherent to the institution of law as a component of the system of law, the author characterizes norms, which regulate execution of judgements, as an institution of administrative process law.

Keywords

 Аdministrative process of administrative jurisdiction case, enforcement proceedings, goals of judicial proceedings, execution of administrative cases.

Reviewer

External reviewer

Article in PDF

 3 248-260

Bibliography

 1. Kodeks administratyvnoho sudochynstva Ukrayiny: Zakon Ukrayiny vid 06.07.2005 r. (iz zminamy ta dopovnennyamy). Vidomosti Verkhovnoyi Rady. 35–37.
2. Tryvalist vykonannia rishen natsionalnykh sudiv Ukrainy v sensi § 1 statti 6 Konventsii u svitli rishen Yevropeiskoho sudu z prav liudyny. Retrieved from: – http://old. minjust.gov.ua/3139.
3. Stefanyuk V. S. (2003) Sudovyy administratyvnyy protses: Monohrafiya. Kharkiv. Firma «Konsum». 464 s.
4. Kolomoyets T. O. (2011) Administratyvne pravo Ukrayiny. Akademichnyy kurs: pidruchnyk. K. Yurinkom Inter. 576 s.
5. Komarov V. V., Bihun V. A., Barankova V. V. ta in. (2011) Kurs tsyvilnoho protsesu: pidruchnyk. Kh. Pravo, 2011.1352 s.
6. Konstantyy O. V. (2015) Problemy zakhystu v administratyvnomu sudochynstvi subyektyvnykh prav, svobod i zakonnykh interesiv: Monohrafiya. K. Istyna. 544 s.
7. Demskyy E. F. (2008) Administratyvne protsesualne pravo Ukrayiny: navch. posib. K. Yurinkom Inter. 496 s.
8. Bytyak Yu. P., Harashchuk V. M., Bohuts’kyy V. V. ta in. (2010) Administratyvne pravo: pidruchnyk .Kh. Pravo. 624 s.
9. Pysarenko N. B. (2015) Do pytannya pro osoblyvosti formuvannya vitchyznyanoyi kontseptsiyi administratyvnoho protsesu. Administratyvne pravo i protses. 3(13). S. 202-216.
10. Pro vykonavche provadzhennya: Zakon Ukrayiny vid 21.04.99 r. (zi zminamy i dopovnennyamy) . Vidomosti Verkhovnoyi Rady Ukrayiny. 24.St. 27.
11. Konventsiya pro zakhyst prav i osnovnykh svobod lyudyny vid 04.11.50 r. Ofitsiynyy visnyk Ukrayiny. 1998. 13.St. 270.
12. Rishennya Yevropeyskoho Sudu z prav lyudyny vid 19 bereznya 1997 roku u spravi «Hornsbi proty Hretsiyi». Praktyka Yevropeys’koho sudu z prav lyudyny. Rishennya. Komentari. 1999. 3.
13. Rishennya Yevropeyskoho Sudu z prav lyudyny vid 27 lypnya 2004 roku u spravi «Romashov proty Ukrayiny». Ofitsiynyy visnyk Ukrayiny. 2005. 3.
14. Rishennya Yevropeyskoho Sudu z prav lyudyny vid 11 sichnya 2005 roku u spravi «Dubenko proty Ukrayiny». Ofitsiynyy visnyk Ukrayiny. 2005. 24.
15. Rishennya Yevropeyskoho sudu z prav lyudyny vid 9 lystopada 2004 roku u spravi «Bakay ta inshi proty Ukrayiny». Ofitsiynyy visnyk Ukrayiny. 2005. № 10. St. 513.
16. Postanova Verkhovnoho sudu Ukrayiny г spravi vid 31 bereznya 2014 roku № 21- 37A14 Retrieved from: http://www.scourt.gov.ua/clients/vsu/vsu.nsf/7864c99c46598 282c2257b4c0037c014/408f6b82d20fbb1cc2257cc8001df901/$FILE/21-37 %D0%B014.doc.
17. Postanova Verkhovnoho Sudu Ukrayiny vid 15 veresnya 2014 roku г spravi № 21-272A14 Retrieved from: http://www.scourt.gov.ua/clients/vsu/vsu.nsf/7864c99c46598282c2257b4c0037c014/748553ccfbbde804c2257d5d0021ccea/$FILE/21-272 %D0 %B014.doc/
18. Pro praktyku zastosuvannya administratyvnymy sudamy zakonodavstva u spravakh iz pryvodu rishen’, diy abo bezdiyal’nosti derzhavnoyi vykonavchoyi sluzhby: Postanova Plenumu Vyshchoho administratyvnoho sudu Ukrayiny vid 13.12.2010 № 3. Visnyk Vyshchoho administratyvnoho sudu Ukrayiny. 2011. 1.
19. Postanova Vyshchoho administratyvnoho sudu Ukrayiny vid 21 hrudnya 2011 r. u spravi № K-46326/09 Retrieved from: http://www.reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/21008604.
20. Postanova Vyshchoho administratyvnoho sudu Ukrayiny vid 10 hrudnya 2015 roku u spravi № K/800/12556/14 Retrieved from: http://www.reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/54436778.
21. Postanova Vyshchoho administratyvnoho sudu Ukrayiny vid 05 lystopada 2014 rokuu spravi № K/9991/35375/11 Retrieved from: http://www.reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/41556320.
22. Postanova Vyshchoho administratyvnoho sudu Ukrayiny vid 14 kvitnya 2016 r. u spravi № K/800/54801/15 Retrieved from: http://www.reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/57199470.
23. Postanova Vyshchoho administratyvnoho sudu Ukrayiny vid 23 lyutoho 2016 roku u spravi № K/800/31200/15 Retrieved from: http://www.reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/56279052.
24. Pysarenko N. B. Somina V. A. (2011) Administratyvno-pravovi spory (udoskonalennya poryadku vyrishennya): monohrafiya. Kh.Pravo. 136 s.
25. Kozyubra M. I., Pohrebnyak S. P., Tselyev O. V., Matvyeyeva Yu. I. (2016) Zahal’na teoriya prava: рidruchnyk. K. Vaite.392 s.

Code DOI

This post is also available in: Russian, Ukrainian

08.09.2016