LEGITIMATE EXPECTATIONS OF THE TAXPAYER IN THE CONTEXT OF TAX AND FEE ADMINISTRATION

Author

, lawyer, certified auditor, graduate student of the Department of Financial Law, Ukraine, Kharkiv

In heading

Law;

Signed print

25.03.2025

Issues number

2025 - № 1 (60)

Page

63-81

Type of articles

Scientific article

Code UDK

351.713:336.225.611

ISSN print

2411-5584

Abstract

Problem setting. In specific situations of law enforcement, the principles of tax law cannot be considered in isolation from each other. The principles act only systematically and should be analyzed in law enforcement exclusively as a set of requirements, compliance with which is required from both the taxpayer and the regulatory authority. However, given that the legal regime of martial law continues, and the Tax Code of Ukraine has constant changes in regulation, the problem of compliance with the principles of tax legislation and especially the principles of stability and legitimate expectations of the taxpayer is acutely on the agenda.
Paper objective. The purpose of the article is to clarify the content and limits of the application of the principle of legitimate expectations of the taxpayer in the administration of taxes and fees, in particular, in the context of significant quantitative changes in tax legislation under martial law.
Paper main body. The principle of legitimate expectations of the taxpayer is based on the doctrine of the rule of law, the principle of legal certainty, and is widely applied in the practice of the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) and the Constitutional Court (CC) of Ukraine. The position of the European Commission “For Democracy through Law” is also based on this approach.
Guided by the practice of the ECHR, the СС of Ukraine, and the norms of the Tax Code (TC) of Ukraine, we must state that, given the essence of the principle of legitimate expectations, a taxpayer has the right to expect stability, predictability, and consistency in the actions of government entities representing the state (legislator, regulatory authorities). Therefore, despite the absence of a direct embody of this principle in the TC of Ukraine, it is obvious that: the norms of tax legislation should not change suddenly and unpredictably, and especially retrospectively; the state, represented by authorized bodies, must act consistently and in good faith, both in the context of legislative regulation and approaches to the interpretation of tax and legal norms; the behavior of a taxpayer that complies with the current tax and legal regulation will not be recognized as unlawful over time only due to a change in tax norms or the vector of their interpretation.
Conclusion of the research. Recently, in its modern practice, the Supreme Court of Ukraine has practically ignored the doctrine of legitimate expectations, preferring the formal effect of legislative norms, even if such norms were introduced in violation of other norms of law and destroy established legal approaches. Such an approach puts the taxpayer in a situation of constant legal uncertainty, which contradicts European standards, which are reproduced in the practice of the Constitutional Court of Ukraine. The implementation of the principle of legitimate expectations of the taxpayer requires the state to be consistent, predictable in its actions, provide an appropriate transition period for changes in legislation, and refrain from retroactive effect of new norms that may negatively affect the legal position of the taxpayer.
Short abstract for an article
Abstract. The content of the principle of legitimate expectations of the taxpayer in the administration of taxes and fees in the context of the operation of the tax legislation of Ukraine under martial law is considered in the article. It is substantiated that this principle, although not directly embody in the Tax Code of Ukraine, follows from the content of the principles of the rule of law and legal certainty. The legal positions of the European Court of Human Rights and the Constitutional Court of Ukraine, which recognize legitimate expectations as an integral element of a democratic state governed by the rule of law, are analyzed. Contradictions in the law-enforcement practice of the Supreme Court of Ukraine, in particular, in resolving tax disputes, are considered. It is shown that the Supreme Court of Ukraine is increasingly departing from the principle of legitimate expectations, preferring formalism and literal interpretation of norms. The example of case No. 200 / 4768 / 23 shows how the Supreme Court changed the established practice regarding the application of the «quarantine» moratorium and changed the limits of the taxpayer»s liability retroactively. The judicial argumentation regarding the non-application of the principle of legitimate expectations in martial law conditions is criticized. It is emphasized that even in emergency situations, the payer has the right to count on the good faith of the state. The need for real, rather than declarative, application of the principles of tax legislation is argued.

Keywords

tax legislation, tax legal norms, principles of tax legislation, regulatory authorities, tax dispute, law enforcement, interpretation, Constitutional Court of Ukraine,
Supreme Court, legal position, martial law.

Reviewer

External reviewer

Article in PDF

Economic Theory and Law, 1-2025-63-81

Bibliography

1. Podatkovyi kodeks Ukrainy vid 02.12.2010 № 2755-VI. (2010). [Tax Code of Ukraine dated December 02, 2010]. https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/2755-17 [in Ukrainian].
2. Postanova Verkhovnoho Sudu vid 19.04.2022 u spravi № 816/687/16. (2022). [Resolution of the Supreme Court dated April 19, 2022 in case No. 816/687/16]. https://supreme.court.gov.ua/supreme/pro_sud/rishennya_sud_palat/palata_19_04_01_2022_816_687_16 [in Ukrainian].
3. Rishennia Yevropeiskoho sudu z prav liudyny «Yvonne Van Duyn vs Home Office» vid 04.12.1974. (1974). [Decision of the European Court of Human Rights “Yvonne Van Duyn vs Home Office” dated December 04, 1974]. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=celex:61974CJ0041 [in Ukrainian].
4. Yevropeiska komisiia «Za demokratiiu cherez pravo» (Venetsianska Komisiia). (2011, April 04). Dopovid «Verkhovenstvo prava» (skhvalena Venetsianskoiu Komisiieiu na 86-mu plenarnomu zasidanni). [Report “Rule of Law”, approved by the Venice Commission at its 86th plenary session]. https://supreme.court.gov.ua/userfiles/CDL_AD_2011_003_rev_2011_04_04.pdf [in Ukrainian].
5. Rishennia Konstytutsiinoho Sudu Ukrainy u spravi za konstytutsiinym podanniam Upovnovazhenoho Verkhovnoi Rady Ukrainy z prav liudyny shchodo vidpovidnosti Konstytutsii Ukrainy (konstytutsiinosti) abzatsu vosmoho punktu 5 chastyny pershoi statti 11 Zakonu Ukrainy «Pro militsiiu» vid 29.06.2010 №17-rp/2010. (2010). [Decision of the Constitutional Court of Ukraine in the case on the constitutional submission of the Commissioner for Human Rights of the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine on the compliance with the Constitution of Ukraine (constitutionality) of paragraph eight, paragraph 5, part one, article 11 of the Law of Ukraine “On the police” dated June 29, 2010]. https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/v017p710-10 [in Ukrainian].
6. Rishennia Konstytutsiinoho Sudu Ukrainy u spravi za konstytutsiinymy podanniamy 48 narodnykh deputativ Ukrainy shchodo vidpovidnosti Konstytutsii Ukrainy (konstytutsiinosti) polozhen abzatsiv trynadtsiatoho, chotyrnadtsiatoho punktu 32 rozdilu I Zakonu Ukrainy «Pro vnesennia zmin do Podatkovoho kodeksu Ukrainy ta deiakykh zakonodavchykh aktiv Ukrainy shchodo podatkovoi reformy» ta Verkhovnoho Sudu Ukrainy shchodo vidpovidnosti Konstytutsii Ukrainy (konstytutsiinosti) polozhennia abzatsu pershoho pidpunktu 164.2.19 punktu 164.2 statti 164 Podatkovoho kodeksu Ukrainy (sprava pro opodatkuvannia pensii i shchomisiachnoho dovichnoho hroshovoho utrymannia) vid 27.02.2018 № 1-rp/2018. (2018). [Decision of the Constitutional Court of Ukraine in the case on constitutional submissions of 48 people’s deputies of Ukraine on the compliance with the Constitution of Ukraine (constitutionality) of the provisions of paragraphs thirteen, fourteen of paragraph 32 of Section I of the Law of Ukraine «On Amendments to the Tax Code of Ukraine and Certain Legislative Acts of Ukraine on Tax Reform» and of the Supreme Court of Ukraine on the compliance with the Constitution of Ukraine (constitutionality) of the provisions of paragraph one of subparagraph 164.2.19 of paragraph 164.2 of Article 164 of the Tax Code of Ukraine (case on taxation of pensions and monthly lifetime financial support) dated February 27, 2018]. https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/v001p710-18 [in Ukrainian].
7. Rishennia Konstytutsiinoho Sudu Ukrainy u spravi za konstytutsiinym podanniam 49 narodnykh deputativ Ukrainy shchodo vidpovidnosti Konstytutsii Ukrainy (konstytutsiinosti) punktu 12 rozdilu I Zakonu Ukrainy «Pro vnesennia zmin ta vyznannia takymy, shcho vtratyly chynnist, deiakykh zakonodavchykh aktiv Ukrainy» vid 22.05.2018 № 5-r/2018. (2018). [Decision of the Constitutional Court of Ukraine in the case on the constitutional submission of 49 people’s deputies of Ukraine on the compliance with the Constitution of Ukraine (constitutionality) of paragraph 12 of Section I of the Law of Ukraine «On Amendments and Recognition of Certain Legislative Acts of Ukraine as Invalid» dated May 22, 2018]. https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/v005p710-18 [in Ukrainian].
8. Postanova Verkhovnoho Sudu u skladi kolehii suddiv Kasatsiinoho administratyvnoho sudu vid 15.05.2019 u spravi № 825/1496/17. (2019). [Resolution of the Supreme Court in the composition of the panel of judges of the Cassation Administrative Court dated May 15, 2019 in case No. 825/1496/17]. http://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/82119034 [in Ukrainian].
9. Postanova Verkhovnoho Sudu u skladi sudovoi palaty z rozghliadu sprav shchodo podatkiv, zboriv ta inshykh obov`iazkovykh platezhiv Kasatsiinoho administratyvnoho sudu vid 26.02.2025 u spravi № 200/4768/23. (2025). [Resolution of the Supreme Court in the composition of the judicial chamber for consideration of cases on taxes, fees and other mandatory payments of the Cassation Administrative Court dated February 26, 2025 in case No. 200/4768/23]. https://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/125892977 [in Ukrainian].
10. Pro vnesennia zmin do Podatkovoho kodeksu Ukrainy ta inshykh zakoniv Ukrainy shchodo osoblyvostei podatkovoho administruvannia podatkiv, zboriv ta yedynoho vnesku pid chas dii voiennoho, nadzvychainoho stanu: Zakon Ukrainy vid 12.05.2022 № 2260-IKh. (2022). [On amendments to the Tax Code of Ukraine and other laws of Ukraine regarding the specifics of the tax administration of taxes, fees and a single contribution during the state of martial law, state of emergency. Law of Ukraine dated May 12, 2022]. https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/2260-20 [in Ukrainian].
11. Pro vnesennia zmin do Podatkovoho kodeksu Ukrainy ta inshykh zakonodavchykh aktiv Ukrainy shchodo osoblyvostei opodatkuvannia ta podannia zvitnosti u period dii voiennoho stanu: Zakon Ukrainy vid 03.03.2022 № 2118. (2022). [On Amendments to the Tax Code of Ukraine and Other Legislative Acts of Ukraine Regarding the Peculiarities of Taxation and Reporting During the Period of Martial Law. Law of Ukraine dated March 03, 2022]. https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/2118-20 [in Ukrainian].
12. Rishennia Konstytutsiinoho Sudu Ukrainy u spravi za konstytutsiinoiu skarhoiu shchodo vidpovidnosti Konstytutsii Ukrainy (konstytutsiinosti) okremoho prypysu abzatsu druhoho pidpunktu 14.1.212 punktu 14.1 statti 14 Podatkovoho kodeksu Ukrainy v redaktsii Zakonu Ukrainy «Pro vnesennia zmin do Podatkovoho kodeksu Ukrainy ta deiakykh zakonodavchykh aktiv Ukrainy shchodo podatkovoi reformy» vid 21.01.2025 № 3-r(II)/2025. (2025). [Decision of the Constitutional Court of Ukraine in the case on a constitutional complaint regarding the compliance with the Constitution of Ukraine (constitutionality) of a separate provision of the second paragraph of subparagraph 14.1.212 of paragraph 14.1 of Article 14 of the Tax Code of Ukraine as amended by the Law of Ukraine “On Amendments to the Tax Code of Ukraine and Certain Legislative Acts of Ukraine on Tax Reform” dated January 21, 2025]. https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/v003p710-25 [in Ukrainian].

Code DOI

https://doi.org/10.31359/2411-5584-2025-60-1-63

This post is also available in: Ukrainian

25.03.2025