МЕЖДУНАРОДНЫЕ СРАВНИТЕЛЬНЫЕ ИССЛЕДОВАНИЯ В ЗЕРКАЛЕ РИТОРИЧЕСКОЙ КОНЦЕПЦИИ МЕТОДА ЭКОНОМИЧЕСКОЙ НАУКИ

Автор

, доктор экономических наук, доцент, профессор, Харьков, пл. Свободы, 4
, кандидат физико-математических наук, доцент, Харьков, Фрунзе, 21

В рубрике

Экономическая теория;

Signed print

23.11.2018

Issues number

2018 - № 4 (35)

Page

11-31

Type of articles

Научная статья

Code UDK

330.101.8:808]:316.77

ISSN print

2411-5584

Abstract

В статье раскрыто содержание риторической концепции метода экономической науки. Дана общая характеристика современных направлений сравнительных исследований социально-экономического развития стран мира и проведен анализ некоторых из них в контексте толкования экономики как риторики. Обоснован общий вывод о том, что наиболее продуктивной методологической основой исследования и интерпретации данных международных сравнительных исследований является риторическая концепция метода экономической науки.

Keywords

экономическая методология, метод экономической науки, экономическая риторика, экономика как риторика, международные сравнительные исследования стран мира.

Рецензент

Внешний рецензент

Article in PDF

№ 4 11-31

Bibliography

1. Colander, D. (2007). Ekonomicheskaya nauka novogo tysyacheletiya: kak ona nashla svoy put i kakov on? [New millennium economics: How did it get this way, and what way is it?]. Istoki: iz opyta izucheniya ekonomiki kak struktury i protsessa – Origins: from the experience of studying economics as a structure and process (pp. 381–398). Moskva: Izdat. dom GU VShE [in Russian].
2. Ananin, O. I. (Ed.). (2008). Ekonomika kak iskusstvo: metodologicheskie voprosy primeneniya ekonomicheskoj teorii v prikladnyh socialno-ekonomicheskih issledovaniyah [Economics as an art: methodological issues of the application of economic theory in applied socio-economic research]. Moscow: Nauka [in Russian].
3. Griliches, Z. (2004). Proizvoditelnost, nauchno-tekhnicheskiy progress i ogranichennost dannykh [Productivity, R&D, and the data constraint]. Istoki: ekonomika v kontekste istorii i kultury – Origins: Economics in the context of history and culture (pp. 122– 165). Moskva: Izdat. dom GU VShE [in Russian].
4. McCloskey, D. N. (2015). Ritorika ekonomicheskoy nauki [The Rhetoric of Economics]. Moscow: Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya [in Russian].
5. Nashchekina, O. N., & Timoshenkov, I. V. (2011). Metodologiya nauchnyh issledovanij: ucheb. posobie [Research Methodology: study guide]. Kharkov: NTU «HPI» [in Russian].
6. Otmakhov, P. A. (2000). «Ritoricheskaya» koncepciya metoda v ekonomicheskoj teorii [«Rhetorical» concept of the method in economic theory]. Istoki – Origins, 138–176 [in Russian].
7. Friedman, M. (1994). Metodologiya pozitivnoy ekonomicheskoy nauki [The methodology of positive economics]. THESIS, 4, 20–52 [in Russian].
8. Raskov, D. (2016). Tehnologicheskie i institucionalnye idei – eto to, chto delaet nash mir sovremennym. Intervyu s Deirdre McCloskey [Technological and institutional ideas are what make our world modern. Interview with Deidra McCloskey]. Ekonomicheskaya politika – Economic policy, 11(3), 224–244 [in Russian].
9. McCloskey, D. N. (1983). The Rhetoric of Economics. Journal of Economic Literature, 21(2), 481–517.
10. Volkov, A. A. (2018, December). Teoriya ritoricheskoj argumentacii. Ritorika Antichnosti i Srednikh vekov [Theory of rhetorical argumentation. The rhetoric of antiquity and the Middle Ages]. Retrieved from https://www.portal-slovo.ru/philology/46844.php [in Russian].
11. Aristotle (2000). Ritorika. Poetika [Rhetoric. Poetics]. Moskva: Labirint [in Russian].
12. Tokarev, S. S. (2018, December). Spravochnik ekonomista-aferista [Handbook of economist scammer]. Korporativnyy menedzhment – Corporate management. Retrieved from https://www.cfin.ru/finanalysis/math/crook.shtml [in Russian].
13. Clapham, Ch., & Nicholson, J. (2014). The Concise Oxford Dictionary of Mathematics. 5th ed. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
14. Timoshenkov, I. V., & Nashchekina, O. N. (2012). Rejtingi universitetov i problema informacionnoj asimmetrii v usloviyah globalizacii [University rankings and the problem of information asymmetry in the context of globalization]. Yevropeiskyi vektor ekonomichnoho rozvytku – European vector of economic development, 2, 329–334 [in Russian].
15. ARWU: Academic Ranking of World Universities 2018 (2018, December). Retrieved from http://www.shanghairanking.com/ARWU2018.html.
16. THE: The Times Higher Education World University Rankings (2018, December). Retrieved from https://www.timeshighereducation.com/world-university-rankings/2019/world-ranking#!/page/0/length/25/sort_by/rank/sort_order/asc/cols/stats.
17. QS World University Rankings (2018, December). Retrieved from https://www.topuniversities.com/qs-world-university-rankings.
18. Timoshenkov, I. V. (2013). Instytutsiini osnovy rozvytku systemy osvity: monohrafiia [Institutional framework for the development of the education system]. Kharkiv: NUA [in Ukrainian].
19. The World Bank Data (2018, December). GDP. Retrieved from https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/NY.GDP.MKTP.CD?view=chart.
20. United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) (2018, December). Human Development Reports. Retrieved from http://www.hdr.undp.org/sites/default/files/2018_human_development_statistical_update_ru.pdf.
21. Helliwell, J. F., Layard, R., & Sachs, J. D. (2018). World Happiness Report 2018. Columbia University: Center for Sustainable Development. Retrieved from https://s3.amazonaws.com/happiness-report/2018/WHR_web.pdf.
22. The World Bank Data (2018, December). GINI Index. Retrieved from https://databank.worldbank.org/data/reports.aspx?source=2&series=SI.POV.GINI&country.

Code DOI

10.31359/2411-5584-2018-35-4-11

CC BYЭта работа лицензирована Creative Commons –Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0)

Эта запись также доступна на: Английский, Украинский

21.11.2018