MODERNIZATION OF THE NATIONAL ECONOMY: NECESSITY, CONTENT AND FEATURES

Author

, professor, Kharkiv, Svobody Sq. 4,
ORCID ID:

In heading

Economic theory;

Signed print

23.11.2018

Issues number

2018 - № 4 (35)

Page

32-43

Type of articles

Scientific article

Code UDK

330.340

ISSN print

2411-5584

Abstract

Problem setting. The complex processes of accelerated socio-economic development, changes in technological and geostrategic configurations in the twenty-first century necessitate the modernization of the economy. Of particular relevance is the task of finding and implementing such a modernization project, which is aimed not only at creating an efficient economy, but also at reconsolidating society on the basis of fairly inclusive social development.
Recent research and publication analysis. Questions of the content and characteristics of the modernization of the national economy are at the center of the scientific discourse of scientists and public figures. Among Ukrainian researchers of problems of modernization, it is necessary to highlight such authors as O. Berveno, V. Geyets, A. Gritsenko, L. Emelianenko, P. Eshchenko, I. Maliy, I. Radionova, O. Soskin, V. Tarasevich, O. Yaremenko and other.
Paper objective. The article is devoted to the methodological foundations of the study of modern modernization, the definition of the main problems and features of its implementation in the context of globalization.
Paper main body. The modern theory of modernization is based on the polyvariability of modernization projects. Modernization does not imply uniform recipes for different economic systems. Only reliance on internal potential, taking into account the technical, economic and socio-cultural characteristics of the country, enhanced by the effective use of macro regulation, can lead to a successful outcome. Social cohesion and social inclusion are crucial aspects of the success of a modernization project. Modern modernization, in contrast to the primary modernization, differs not only in historical
conditions and content, but also, which is especially important, in goals. The main goal of primary modernization was the development of the economy and, on this basis, the satisfaction of the material needs of the population, ensuring its economic security. Modern secondary modernization is aimed at the person and his quality of life, at ensuring the inclusiveness of development.
Conclusion of the research. A special role in the implementation of the modernization project belongs to the state, which plays a proactive role in institutional changes, in the establishment of an inclusive institutional regime, in the organization of public life on the principles of social justice.
Short Abstract for the article
Abstract. Summarizing the approaches to the assessment of modern modernization, the author highlights its essential feature – focus on the person, his quality of life. The harmonious development of the economy and society implies their simultaneous interdependent development. An effective economy based on an inclusive institutional regime turns into the original technology of modernization of the national economy.

Keywords

modernization, inclusive development, quality of life, economic efficiency, social capital, globalization, economic policy.

Reviewer

External reviewer

Article in PDF

32-43

Bibliography

1. Malyi, I. (Ed.). (2017). Antykryzove upravlinnia natsionalnoiu ekonomikoiu [Anticrisis management of the national economy]. Kyiv: KNEU [in Ukrainian].
2. Soskin, O. I. (2014). Narodnyi kapitalizm: ekonomichna model dlia Ukrainy [Popular capitalism: an economic model for Ukraine]. Kyiv: Vyd-vo «ITS» [in Ukrainian].
3. Eschenko, P. S. (2017). Ukrainskaya «velikaya depressiya» i kak iz nee vyiyti? [Ukrainian "Great Depression" and how to get out of it?]. Kiev: VD «Dakor» [in Russian].
4. Hrytsenko, A. (2016). Rekonstruktyvnyi ekonomichnyi rozvytok: zmist, osnovni napriamy i vektor sotsialnoi spravedlyvosti [Reconstructive economic development: content, main directions and vector of social justice]. Ekonomichna teoriia – Economic theory, 4, 5-19 [in Ukrainian].
5. Yaremenko, O. (2016). Superechlyva yednist ekonomichnoi efektyvnosti ta sotsialnoi spravedlyvosti yak chynnyk funktsionuvannia ta evoliutsii ekonomichnykh system [Controversial unity of economic efficiency and social justice as a factor in the functioning and evolution of economic systems]. Ekonomichna teoriia – Economic theory, 4, 19-33 [in Ukrainian].
6. Tarasevych ,V. M., & Zavhorodnia, O. O. (2016). Natsionalnyi ekonomichnyi patriotyzm ta evoliutsiini imperatyvy makroekonomichnoi dynamiky [National economic patriotism and evolutionary imperatives of macroeconomic dynamics] Aktualni problemy ekonomiky – Actual problems of the economy, 6(180), 6-12 [in Ukrainian].
7. Atkinson, A. B., & Marlier, E. (2010). Analysing and Measuring Social Inclusion in a Global Context. New York: United Nations.
8. Sen, A. (2000). Social Exclusion: Concept, Application, and Scrutiny. Social Development Papers, 1, 54.
9. Acemoglu, D., & Robinson, J. (2012). Why nations fail: the origins of power, prosperity, and poverty. New York: Crown Publishers.
10. World Economic Forum (2017). The Inclusive Growth and Development Report 2017. Geneva: World Economic Forum.
11. Kolodko, G. V (2014). Kuda idet mir: politicheskaya ekonomiya buduschego [Where the world goes: the political economy of the future]. Moskva: Magistr [in Russian].
12. Rih, A.(1996). Hozyaystvennaya etika [Economic ethics]. V. V. Sapov (Ed.). Moskva: Posev [in Russian].
13. List, F. (1891). Natsionalnaya sistema politicheskoy ekonomii [National System of Political Economy]. K. V. Trubnikov (Ed.). Sankt-Peterburg: A. E. Martens [in Russian].
14. Chuantsi, He (Ed.). (2011). Obzornyiy doklad o modernizatsii v mire i v Kitae (2001-2010) [Overview report on modernization in the world and in China (2001-2010)]. Moskva: Ves Mir [in Russian].
15. Buzgalin, A., & Kolganov, A. (2015). Globalnyiy kapital [Global capital]. (Vol. 2 Teoriya. Globalnaya gegemoniya kapitala i ee predelyi [Theory. Global hegemony of capital and its limits]). Moskva: Magistr [in Russian].
16. Amosov, O., & Gavkalova, N. (2012). Vliyanie modernizatsii na arhetipiku gosudarstvennogo upravleniya [The impact of modernization on the archetypal state administration]. Publichnoe upravlenie: teoriya i praktika – Public Administration: Theory and Practice, Spetsialnyiy vyipusk, 6-13 [in Russian].
17. Tiutiunnykova, S. V., & Berveno, O. V. (2017). Modernizatsii upravlinnia natsionalnoiu ekonomikoiu v konteksti zabezpechennia yakosti zhyttia [Modernization of national economy management in the context of providing quality of life.]. In I. Malohov (Ed.), Antykryzove upravlinnia natsionalnoiu ekonomikoiu [Anti-crisis management of the national economy] (pp. 298-311). Kyiv: KNEU [in Ukrainian].

16.11.2018